Patentability of Computer-Implemented Inventions Post-Commissioner of Patents v Aristocrat: A Brave New World or Dystopian Future?

Spotlight on Upcoming Oral Arguments – November 2022

The following telephone arguments will be available to the public live. Access information will be available by 9 AM ET each day of argument at: https://cafc.uscourts.gov/home/oral-argument/listen-to-oral-arguments/. Tuesday, November 1, 2022 Eurica Califorrniaa v. Vidal, No. 22-1640 This case involves a challenge to the USPTO’s patent term adjustment (“PTA”) calculation. Mr. Califorrniaa filed a patent application…

Patentability of Computer-Implemented Inventions Post-Commissioner of Patents v Aristocrat: A Brave New World or Dystopian Future?

The Alice Test for Patent Ineligibility in Practice: The Federal Circuit Reverses District Court’s Dismissal of an Infringement Case

One of the threshold requirements for obtaining a patent under U.S. law is that the invention is a “new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof…” In other words, the subject matter of the invention must be eligible for patenting. Many courts have used this requirement…

Patentability of Computer-Implemented Inventions Post-Commissioner of Patents v Aristocrat: A Brave New World or Dystopian Future?

CareDx v. Natera: Cooked by Boilerplate

On July 18, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a precedential decision invalidating yet more patents directed to diagnostic methods. The case was CareDx, Inc. v. Natera, Inc., No. 2022-1027 (Fed. Cir. July 18, 2022), and the patents at issue related to methods for diagnosing or predicting organ transplant status using various methods…